Title: The
Congress
Country: USA
Score: 2.5
Actress Robin Wright (of
Princess Bride and Forrest Gump fame) plays a near-future version of herself.
Out of work and worried about her son’s narratively-convenient illness, she
considers an offer (from the painfully on the nose ‘Miramount’ studio) to have
herself digitized so that a computer likeness of her can star in endless crappy
blockbusters. After initially demurring she takes the plunge and for the next
hour plus the movie switches from live action to animation. Fast forward a few
decades and we find Robin on her way to the titular congress, in a bustling world
of the mind where she will preach clumsily about the sins of media and
commodification before a riot or a revolution or something breaks out. Then she
gets rescued by a slubby animator and they fall in love and get executed and
fly around in fantasy land with angel wings and talk in forlorn voices about
how lost humanity is and then go looking for her son because she’s a good
mother and that what they do. It is rather hard to follow and generally even
harder to care.
I’m a self-avowed fan of
excessively ambitious SF failures (witnesses can testify that I’ve defended
Interstellar, Southland Tales and Waterworld to name a few), but The Congress
is so many drafts away from working that I wonder how production even got
approved to begin. There are tons of ideas, many of them interesting, none of
them fully baked. The acting is served up with generous portions of ham, all
the more intolerably because these people should know better: Harvey Keitel,
Danny Huston, Paul Giamatti, Jon Hamm. (Robin Wright, in her defense, is the
least bad.) Only the animation has sparks of creative genius, but the
futuristic world-building is ceaselessly undermined by the screenplays bitter
finger-wagging at Hollywood studio crudeness, celebrity worship, corporate
fascism, audience pleasure-seeking, virtual worlds replacing reality and other
typical technology fears that you can probably guess.
The director seems unaware that
telling a good story can make these themes clear without literally having an
authorial mouthpiece present them in a speech. Nor is there any sense that
societal, cultural and technological change is complicated enough to have both positive and negative results. Instead
we get a film that tiresomely points out how we are obsessed with celebrities, but
which is itself jam-pack will ill-fitting celebrities. And we are force fed a
lot of bad art ranting about how studios put out so much bad art.
Go see Ari Folman’s previous
“Waltz with Bashir” (I even wrote about it here),
and pretend this shrill satire didn’t happen. Folman has demonstrated that he’s
good with material that is close to his heart and his own experience, but this big,
loud, fuzzy dust bunny of ideas does nothing but ruin a perfectly decent
Stanislaw Lem novel and a handful of reputations.